Tuesday, 21 September 2010

Constabulary photo e fit suffers a bad hair day

It should have been easy enough to spot the suspected criminals walking around with hair shaped like a lettuce and a fringe resembling a green barcode.

However the public alert for the unusual looking suspects was withdrawn yesterday when Hampshire Constabulary admitted it was experiencing “technical problems” with its e-fit software.


The police force came under fire for releasing “absolutely ridiculous” e-fits after a burglary suspect looked like he was wearing a lettuce on his head.

Officers said a technical problem caused the unusual hair colour and admitted it was not the “best quality”.However it appeared that the problem was more widespread after a series of images emerged with suspects sporting disastrous hairstyles and looking like computer characters from the 1990s.

A suspected robber, in his late teens, sported a fringe which looked like a barcode. Another alleged criminal appeared to have red eyes.

Hampshire Police issued the original e-fit, of the man with the lettuce-shaped hair, to try to trace a distraction burglar who stole £60 from an elderly woman in Stockbridge.Although the offender was described by his vctim as having wavy blonde/greying hair and being about 40 the image showed him with green hair and was described as “ludicrous” by residents.

A Hampshire police spokeswoman said: “We make every effort to ensure that the e-fits we circulate are as accurate and detailed as they possibly can be from the description provided by the witness.

“This is borne out by the quality and detail contained within the facial features.

“We are, though, currently experiencing technical problems with the quality of the hair and are waiting for an upgrade to the system from the company who provides us with the software.”

She went on: “We have a duty to do all we can to identify those involved in crime, prevent further occurrences and protect the public and while the hair on this image may not be of the best quality, it takes nothing from the overall clarity of the facial features.


“It would therefore be wrong to withhold the release of the e-fit just based on this technical issue.

“We would never release an e-fit a victim disagreed or was unhappy with and in this instance the victim fully supported the publication of this image.”

Detective Constable Danielle Robinson said: “I would like to hear from anyone who has information about this incident or who recognises the man in the e-fit image as he may be able to help with our inquiries.”

A local resident said: “It seems like the force has some gremlins in its system, but anyone could’ve looked at the images and seen how stupid they look.

“How people are expected to identify these suspects when their e-fits look like pictures my three year old son drew with a crayon is beyond me.

“It seems like it’s been going on for a while and Hampshire Constabulary need to sort it out.”

Wednesday, 1 September 2010

Digging the dirt

Your phone, desk and kitchen are all crawling with bugs. Just how worried should you be?

Pull on your rubber gloves and get out your mobile phone — for this little gadget can harbour 18 times more bacteria than a toilet flush handle, warns new research. Or we could try exchanging mucky e-mails. Because your laptop keyboard is likely to be crawling with the stomach bug campylobacter, says another new report.
That may be enough to send you running to the bathroom for a good scrub — but beware: the seals around your bath and washbasin are a “prime spot” for dangerous bugs including E. coli and Staphylococcus aureus, which are linked to food poisoning and breathing problems, says yet another new study.
These three separate reports last week — from the consumer watchdog Which?, the Hygiene Council and the microbiologist Professor Hugh Pennington, are merely the tip of a revolting iceberg. They add to research that shows how our lives are beset by contamination with potentially lethal bacteria. The Hygiene Council report says that bathrooms are not the only home threat: 20 per cent of kitchen cloths are a danger, and a third of fridges are contaminated by fungal spores.
A wealth of studies have been done in hygiene-conscious America by Dr Charles Gerber, of the University of Arizona. He has found that there are more faecal bacteria in your kitchen sink than in your toilet after you flush it. And there is apparently 200 times more E. coli on your kitchen cutting board than on a toilet seat. “It’s safer to make a sandwich on a toilet seat,” he says.
It may also be safer to work on the loo than at your desk, says Dr Gerber, a professor of environmental microbiology.
He has shown that there are typically 400 times more bacteria per square centimetre on a desk surface than on a toilet seat. He also notes that television remote controls in hotels are dirtier than the loo. “The dirt is often urine, semen or faeces,” he says.
There is no escape. Dr Gerber has found serious contamination pretty much everywhere: inside domestic washing machines, on supermarket trolley handles — even your Manolos are not safe. Shoes can harbour ten million bacteria per square inch, he says. It may be safer to wear toilets.
In fact, there is no need to panic. Yes, we are surrounded by bacteria. And our skins are covered with bacteria. These two statements have always been true. But we haven’t all dropped dead. Most bacteria are harmless, and those that may be pathogenic are not usually around in sufficient numbers to cause harm. Infectious-disease experts say that the one common household item that should be handled with caution is the dishcloth, as it tends to stay damp as well as dirty and can act as a breeding ground for infectious nasties to grow in sufficient numbers to be dangerous.
Our best bet is simply to follow sensible hygiene routines, such as washing hands after using the bathroom and before handling food. And to prevent infecting others, the official advice (as it was during the swine flu scare) is to cover our noses and mouths when we cough or sneeze, use a tissue whenever possible, and dispose of used tissues quickly and sensibly. It is tediously unspectacular, but effective.
But why do all this research? Without in any way disparaging Dr Gerber’s integrity, there is a wider agenda in such awareness-raising. It is worth pointing out that Dr Gerber has worked closely with commercial companies that, for example, sell cleaning agents and personal sanitisers, market washable shoes and build trolley-sanitising machines. Closer to home, one should also point out that the Hygiene Council is sponsored by Dettol.
But we also love to read these stories. They tickle our primordial paranoia about contagion and death, to the point where mass media reporting has helped to precipitate an epidemic of spermaphobia (even the clinical term for fear of germs sounds yucky).
A report by Mintel, the market researchers, shows how deeply this fear has spread. Last year, about 26 million British adults bought antibacterial handwash. An astonishing nine out of ten of us bought some kind of antibacterial personal-care product (and these figures predate the impact of swine flu fears).