http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/travel/holiday_type/breaks/article7056736.ece.
Sit back and enjoy the comments made by Times readers:
My personal fave is, like me, short and sweet:
Bath? BATH!!- is someone having a laugh?
Bath
A nonsense that you feature traffic-clogged Bath and not sublime, atmospheric and wonderful Venice.
Bath???? Are you hallucinating?
Havana
Bath and Havana? I think not.
London
London is always the winner - sunny Turnpike Lane and Wood Green, ahh the memories. Dog do, kfc wrappers and barf up to your ankles, grumpy rude folk everywhere, a fiver a pint, 60 quid for the footie. Gives me a headache every time.
As for London, the pictures I've seen of ladies on a night out doesn't make for very "hot" even if they are wearing stilletos and short dresses!
London is glamourous at a price. It is overpriced and unwelcoming unless you have pots of money and no expectations. It is burdened with traffic, litter and pollution. Yes there are attractions but as a whole, the city is not a winner in this category. With airports situated far away from the City you can spend as much time getting into the centre as you did on your flights to London.
New York
Berlin
Berlin? I was there last week for the first time and found it as much fun as a cold bath.
Paris
Paris? You have to be kidding. Paris is a late middle-aged woman with only self-denial hiding the saggy flesh and wrinkles. Romantic? Technically being possible, but only with the light out and after considerable intake of alcohol - dont delay search for your flights to Paris today.
Stockholm
Stockholm? STOCKHOLM? Over, say, Moscow, Shanghai, Tokyo, Rio, Sydney? Who is paying these writers?
Even Helsinki is better than Stockholm, not to mention Copenhagen.
Other cities on the list:
Istanbul
St Petersburg
Rome
Seville
Tangier
